WASHoholic Anonymous - Confessions of Failure and how to Reform

Convenor(s):
Aguaconsult; Directorate-General for International Cooperation, The Netherlands; German Toilet Organization; Viva con Agua ; Welthungerhilfe;

"$30 brings clean water a person" - The promise made by marketing departments of WASH implementers and accepted by donors and governments.  The truth is this may provide first time access to people but not sustainable services. The theoretical foundation for sustainability is established in the WASH Sustainability Charter but translating broad policy discussions into practice is proving difficult.

This seminar builds on the Agenda for Change initiative, the WASH Sustainability Forum and a workshop on Post Implementation Monitoring (PIM) where practitioners, funders and government debated obstacles to general uptake and scaling up of corrective actions to improve sector sustainability..

State and non-state WASH actors have project monitoring systems and tools that capture project implementation data to report against budgetary investments, fund raising and marketing. Fewer actors collect and share information on investments after the project ends. The concerns of WASH practitioners include: monitoring for sustainability is not budgeted; fear of reporting failure of services; and,, ambiguity about responsibility for corrective action.

Monitoring, reporting and greater transparency about failures and success after the project and support to governments to use this information will help keep our promise of universal access to WASH services by 2030.

14:00  Welcome and Setting the Scene

Thilo Panzerbieter, German Toilet Organization

Setting the Scene: The Sustainability Crisis in the WASH Sector, Harold Lockwood, Aguaconsult

 

Confessions of Failure

14:05  Implementing partner confessional: The sustainability challenge from a practitioner and donor perspective

Stephan Simon, Welthungerhilfe and Christian Wiebe, Viva Con Agua

 

14:15  Local government confessional: Are local governments fulfilling their role to ensure sustainable service delivery?

Aggrey Nayuhamya, Chairman of Kamwenge District in Western Uganda

 

14:20  Research and learning confessional: The "Agenda for Change" - a good step into the right direction?

Dr. Patrick Moriarty, IRC

 

14:25  Donor confessional: The “Sustainability Clause" - what it can do and what it cannot

Dick van Ginhoven, DGIS 

 

14:30  Question and Answers

 

Round Table Discussion

14: 40  Round table discussion on the following themes:

Guiding Questions:

What change in programming would increase long-term sustainability of services? What incentives are needed?

 

Reporting Back and Closure

15:15  Reporting back from tables  

 

Results from the table discussions

 

Program design and management

  • Reflect full life cycle costs in the programming approach
  • Programming has to look beyond the program duration and needs to reflect what is in 5-10 years
  • Change in project timelines to go beyond few years, incl. joint follow up and monitoring
  • Community driven and needs based project designs
  • Focus on local materials, simple and locally appropriate concepts and technologies
  • O&M manuals, adapted to local framework conditions
  • Involve all stakeholders in demand creation
  • Require evidence that stakeholder network (expected to sustain services) has been developed
  • Driving license for WASH (quality management)

 

Monitoring

  • Switch from outputs to outcome (more evidence on outcome and impact level needed)
  • More local ownership of monitoring systems at district and national level (rather than focusing on own NGOs monitoring strengthening of national monitoring system)
  • Formative research to inform programming, programs should remain flexible to incorporate results and adapt accordingly
  • Go beyond traditional monitoring

 

Financing

  • Financial warranty withholding for NGO partners (paid after several years when systems are still working)
  • Non-earmarked funding by donors required
  • Balance the need for subsidies with capacity to contribute own resources
  • Flexible donor funding (changing targets)
  • Ringfence revenues
  • Give incentive to local financial market to invest in WASH as the financing of the sector should be more domestic (local currency lending)
  • Capital market in countries often willing to invest in water sector if it is credit-worthy (with guarantees by donors)

 

Policy

  • Political process at country level has first priority
  • Support of government systems and make them more accountable as duty bearer
  • Support ownership within local government
  • Donors need to address own and partners failures
  • Strengthen links between NGOs, donors and Governments
  • Need to advocate donors to push for national system strengthening
  • Community and government involvement – needs to be improved
  • Work with politicians to create long term incentives, which go beyond their term of duty
  • Work with monetary and non-monetary incentives (pride, honor) that keeps people moving
  • Promotion of initiatives like Agenda for Change, Sector-wide strategy will be helpful (coordination systems, joint framework, indicators
  • National Authorities/Governments as owner of investments
  • Avoid bypassing of governments as duty bearers

 

Others

  • Put more focus on the change process (not so much on technologies and specific problems)
  • Often we are doing things to fast, it needs time for planning and to reflect in a learning process
  • Bring in the private sector
  • Focus of NGOs being driven by donor demands. Need to change their mindset
  • Include self-supply in rural areas (ownership of beneficiaries and we should be open that people know best what they do)
  • Profit: Market-based opportunities and solutions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back
You may also be interested in...