Good water governance for inclusive growth and poverty reduction
Seminar 8 - 3rd session: Indicators for Good Water Governance
Good governance from local to transboundary levels is a prerequisite for managing too much, too little and too polluted water with a view to contributing to more sustainable and inclusive growth. Stakeholder participation includes the recognition of power asymmetry and gender-differentiated roles in achieving good governance as central to effective, inclusive and efficient water resources management. How can robust public policies be designed and implemented that contribute to SDG 6 and other water-related goals? How to engage stakeholders effectively when dealing with diverse social and economic ‘endowments’? How can institutions translate local action into inclusive growth and reap the full benefits of national frameworks at all levels? How can the food, energy and the environmental sectors be brought into the equation; and what is the private sector’ contribution? Most importantly, how to ensure accountability and avoid corruption creeping in?
During the seminar posters will be presented. Please find them online under the resources tab.
Session 3: Indicators of good water governance
Chair: Dr. Aziza Akhmouch, OECD
14:00 Welcome and aim of the session
Dr. Aziza Akhmouch, OECD
14:05 Towards OECD Indicators on Water Governance
Peter Glas, President, OECD Water Governance Initiative
14:15 Establishing responsible water resource authorities in South
Aileen Andersen, Crossflow Consulting
14:25 Panel Discussion: Measuring the performance of water-related
Moderator: Aziza Akhmouch, OECD
- Dr. Donal O’Leary, Transparency International
- Prof. Pierre Alain Roche, ASTEE
- Teun Bastemeijer, Water Integrity Network
- Eric Tardieu, International Network of Basin Organisations
- Dr. Håkan Tropp, SIWI
15:00 Discussion with the audience, Q&A
15:15 Main conclusions and way forward
Dr. Jenny Grönwall, SIWI
Good governance from local to transboundary levels is a prerequisite for managing too much, too little and too polluted water with a view to contributing to more sustainable and inclusive growth. Stakeholder participation includes the recognition of power asymmetry and gender-differentiated roles in achieving good governance as central to effective, inclusive and efficient water resources management. Such aspects come to mind when considering good water governance which needs to be supported by practice rather than being an event or an end in itself. The core of this seminar stressed on inclusiveness, functionality and profitability of water structures. Balanced growth and poverty reductions were elicit from three continuous measurement levels: conditions, progress and impact of public policies in bottom-up and multi-stakeholder water networks. Novel methodologies and frameworks were discussed, from power asymmetries measurement approaches to transparent practices and economic viable strategies on access, management and reuse of water.
Initial session discussed on tools and methodologies. Prof. Francisco Nunes Correia reflected water governance as a myriad of rules, practices and processes than can effectively enhance inclusiveness in water policies. Concrete implementation of good practices like water stewardship and progressive tariff showed how collaborative action acknowledging cultural diversity, capacity gaps, and differential needs could enhance equitable growth and boost sustainable development on water management. Social network analysis, designed as a comprehensive assessment tool, identify political spaces for change and recognize power relationships of all stakeholders involved, so that water and sanitation development initiatives are fair and sustainable for all segments of society.
From theory to practice, second session showed successful case studies of good water governance that overcome barriers on implementation. Dr. Diana Suhardiman reviewed how understanding the cultural norms and practices are key to overcome the institutionalized corruption for structural change in water governance. Presentations from specialists promoted fruitful discussions on transboundary water management and performance measurement, through public-private partnerships and water infrastructure.
Following on the different levels of measurement, an important challenge to improve water governance is to overcome the difficulty to monitor/assess performance. This requires an agreed set of specific indicators for good water governance that are not SDGs indicators. Therefore, collecting the right type of data and the ability to channel such information to end users, relying on both government and non-government organizations, contributes to ensure the measurement of indicators of good water governance.
Good water governance requires the ability to mainstream integrity and transparency to respond to the need for structural change to reduce corruption. Policy reform to eradicate corruption requires careful consideration of the cultural setting and common practices of the society. International donors and policy makers help strengthen ‘agents of change’ by working together with accountable agencies and institutions that act both as partner and third party observer, towards strengthening institutional accountability.
Maximizing economic & social welfare through localised water resources managementhttp://worldwaterweek2016.ipostersessions.com/default.aspx?s=55-0F-1F-23-C8-CD-F4-A2-E8-18-F7-FB-88-B4-94-E1
Since 2012, Water For People has partnered with Strathclyde University to implement an Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) approach in the Traditional Authority Chapananga in Chikwawa-Malawi. The goal was to maximize economic and social welfare
Church CBO models sustains bore holes from Rushere Town Boardhttp://worldwaterweek2016.ipostersessions.com/default.aspx?s=15-A2-67-86-2D-02-EA-40-6D-E9-F7-C2-13-E2-13-6C
I work as H&S Coordinator with Living water International Uganda an organization which runs an integrated WASH program in the South-Western part of Uganda in Kiruhura district. The program highlights the sustainability of water points, sensitization of w
Water governance under resource extractivism - the case of Mongoliahttp://worldwaterweek2016.ipostersessions.com/default.aspx?s=C4-5D-89-3B-07-78-0B-85-C0-2D-35-F5-79-5F-E5-2B
A rare case of a long-term analysis of institutional change presenting the case of Mongolia’s water sector analyzing to what extent water governance reforms have been able to make the country’s resource-based growth path more sustainable.
Reliable and sustainable rural water supply governance through meaningful consultationhttp://worldwaterweek2016.ipostersessions.com/default.aspx?s=E4-4D-F3-B3-92-2C-FE-2C-D0-A8-E1-DD-EB-52-0E-F6
The study has put-forth findings based on direct involvement of a private design firm in preparation of project reports for rural water supply schemes initiated by the Rural Development Panchayat Raj Department (RDPR). The study highlights current govern
Best practices in municipal governance of water services, Lessons from Medellin, Colombiahttp://worldwaterweek2016.ipostersessions.com/default.aspx?s=78-50-0D-C6-83-D8-2D-B3-F7-CA-50-81-80-E5-EA-F1
This paper highlights best practices in the governance of water services demonstrated by Empresas Publicas de Medellin (EPM), the Colombian multi-utility company associated with the resilience of city of Medellin after decades of violent instability. Th
Ramping-up access in Niger: reform, pro-poor policies, and performancehttp://worldwaterweek2016.ipostersessions.com/default.aspx?s=B7-16-34-D7-64-6F-6B-BB-47-8A-1A-6A-2C-22-91-22
The water reform in Niger was designed to meet the country’s commitment to develop access to drinking water through social private connections and public standpipes. The leadership of the national authorities, the strong support of the World Bank to the